|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 11, 2008 20:25:20 GMT
I'm not. They handle public scrutney quite well, they are generating huge investment, and everything else we have read over the past weeks.
The only different wavelength we are on is you are committed to showing the bad of them and I am committed to showing the good parts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wasp on Apr 11, 2008 20:30:09 GMT
I am commited to showing the truth and I will acknowledge any good points as I have done in the past. Sadly there aren't any to show apart from sinn fein wanting to hide from the truth about what happened to the victims, especailly the ones that they and their ilk created and supported creating.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 11, 2008 20:59:38 GMT
Wasnt there an agreement on another topic that truth is something that is rarely spoken?
Remember Wasp truth on victims is one aspect of being in Government, there are many more.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wasp on Apr 12, 2008 18:17:12 GMT
Yes Jim and sinn fein certainly are not acting like a party fit for governement on certain issues such as there provocative, easily offended and antagonizing nature.
Until this stops I can only wish for a return to direct rule, I don't know if other Unionists here originally supported the gfa or not but my guess would be that some of them who did no longer do so. The reasons for this lie completely with sinn fein and what they are doing along with the dupers and how they are dealing with the actions of sinn fein.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bilk on Apr 12, 2008 18:26:36 GMT
Wasnt there an agreement on another topic that truth is something that is rarely spoken? Remember Wasp truth on victims is one aspect of being in Government, there are many more. True, but none more important than this issue. It's been 10 years since the GFA, and still not a word on the victims. The perpatrators were released immediately, but the victims are still left without a voice, how long must they wait? |
|
|
|
Post by Bilk on Apr 12, 2008 18:43:33 GMT
"Alliance had tabled a number of amendments, including a cap on the number of commissioners at four. It appears Sinn Fein did not like the idea of a chief commissioner being created from within the four member commission, because it feared losing its veto on the commission, which at present will have to make decisions by consensus. " This is their problem  It would be like the goverment itself, "concensus"? no chance, you must be joking, really they have to be joking. "Concensus" means if SF don't like what's about to come out, it doesn't come out. Just like everthing about this government. Under the rules of concensus, nothing of any value will ever get done. It's a joke. Nowhere else in the world would they tolerate this kind of governance. I unnderstood when I first read the GFA that any decisions had to have "cross comunity support" who do the SDLP represent? In that respect this had cross community support. But nothing gets done no matter who supports it, if SF don't. They govern by deceit, shold I be surprised? |
|
