|
|
Post by Wasp on Jul 14, 2010 21:01:41 GMT
 Uploaded with ImageShack.usCan you now see the point many many people have made concerning celtic fans bare sectarian hatred?  Uploaded with ImageShack.us Uploaded with ImageShack.usCan you now see why so many have said the tri-colour is a symbol of sectarian hatred towards the Protestant community and that this hatred has been installed over generations?? Yeh really peaceful. |
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jul 14, 2010 22:54:43 GMT
What a load of pish. Two dickheads with a tricolour and one dickhead with a celtic top. Aye, that represents 9 million fans.
|
|
|
|
Post by leeside on Jul 14, 2010 23:26:24 GMT
Can you also see why the union jack/stormont flag and ranger supporters would also be seen in the same light by catholics in the north?
|
|
|
|
Post by bloodyangry on Jul 15, 2010 2:34:58 GMT
Can you also see why the union jack/stormont flag and ranger supporters would also be seen in the same light by catholics in the north? Tosser !!!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by leeside on Jul 15, 2010 10:55:59 GMT
Can you also see why the union jack/stormont flag and ranger supporters would also be seen in the same light by catholics in the north? Tosser !!!!!! We have a bright spark on the scene, i see  |
|
|
|
Post by Wasp on Jul 15, 2010 16:19:56 GMT
What a load of pish. Two dickheads with a tricolour and one dickhead with a celtic top. Aye, that represents 9 million fans. Tongue in cheek Jim, hope you saw my point. Two wee girls with painting on their faces was described as representative of my culture, it was even used to back the irish presidents ill judged points. Now there is a big difference between 2 kids smiling for a camera and violent youths helping tear areas apart so if 2 kids smiling with face paint backs the irish presidents lies what does violent thugs rioting back?? Hope you get my point. |
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jul 16, 2010 10:08:24 GMT
What a load of pish. Two dickheads with a tricolour and one dickhead with a celtic top. Aye, that represents 9 million fans. Tongue in cheek Jim, hope you saw my point. Two wee girls with painting on their faces was described as representative of my culture, it was even used to back the irish presidents ill judged points. Now there is a big difference between 2 kids smiling for a camera and violent youths helping tear areas apart so if 2 kids smiling with face paint backs the irish presidents lies what does violent thugs rioting back?? Hope you get my point. Two wee girls with kill all taigs painted on their face. I get the point, I never said I didn't, however, those two girls represent a lot more people than those wee shites in celtic tops do. They look lower middle class, well kept. The arseholes throwing bricks and holding tricolours are hoods who are stealing cars any other night, NOT representative of anyone but themselves. |
|
|
|
Post by Wasp on Jul 16, 2010 19:19:27 GMT
Tongue in cheek Jim, hope you saw my point. Two wee girls with painting on their faces was described as representative of my culture, it was even used to back the irish presidents ill judged points. Now there is a big difference between 2 kids smiling for a camera and violent youths helping tear areas apart so if 2 kids smiling with face paint backs the irish presidents lies what does violent thugs rioting back?? Hope you get my point. Two wee girls with kill all taigs painted on their face. I get the point, I never said I didn't, however, those two girls represent a lot more people than those wee shites in celtic tops do. They look lower middle class, well kept. The arseholes throwing bricks and holding tricolours are hoods who are stealing cars any other night, NOT representative of anyone but themselves. Now come on Jim dont give me that, you know as well as I do some of those wee shites could very well be from better backgrounds, how the 2 girls look and what there background is could be totally different, they could be upper class but that doesnt matter. You know as well as I do when republican rioters took to the streets many were wearing their tribal colours and not all were wee rioting hoods who dont represent anyone. You also know as well as I do that many of these wee thugs are politically motivated sobre or drunk, they shout and hurl sectarian abuse, carry out sectarian attacks and are very anti-Protestant and British. It is the same for the those on my side as well so thopse 2 girls do not represent far more people than the rioting thugs. |
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jul 17, 2010 1:44:14 GMT
Two wee girls with kill all taigs painted on their face. I get the point, I never said I didn't, however, those two girls represent a lot more people than those wee shites in celtic tops do. They look lower middle class, well kept. The arseholes throwing bricks and holding tricolours are hoods who are stealing cars any other night, NOT representative of anyone but themselves. Now come on Jim dont give me that, you know as well as I do some of those wee shites could very well be from better backgrounds, how the 2 girls look and what there background is could be totally different, they could be upper class but that doesnt matter. You know as well as I do when republican rioters took to the streets many were wearing their tribal colours and not all were wee rioting hoods who dont represent anyone. You also know as well as I do that many of these wee thugs are politically motivated sobre or drunk, they shout and hurl sectarian abuse, carry out sectarian attacks and are very anti-Protestant and British. It is the same for the those on my side as well so thopse 2 girls do not represent far more people than the rioting thugs. Me balls mate! They aren't from better backgrounds, they are the scum of the earth. It does matter, it matters so much. People from a middle to upper class background for all their moral and economic surperiority should know better. Those two wee fools are letting their community down, their family down, and quite frankly, you and any other peaceful unionists who dont agree with it. Those dirty wee hoods on the other hand do not represent nationalists, they arent there celebrating anything, they're there because they are bored stealing fucking cars. A few may be politically motivated. Most want a scrap. They arent politically motivated when theyre dealing drugs up the shankill. Most spend their time destroying their own community. Anyone politically motivated does not do what they do. Anyone politically motivated usually has the basic intelligence to do the opposite. |
|
|
|
Post by Wasp on Jul 18, 2010 10:13:32 GMT
That is a bit snobby Jim unless I have misunderstood you. How do those from middle to upper class have moral superiority?? People from all back grounds should know better, unfortunately some parents dont care.
Rubbish, those 2 wee girls are no different than republican youths shouting abuse at Protestants never mind rioting. Also anyone that I know matches the word taig with ira supporters etc not catholics in general. Those 2 kids do not represent me, my culture or my community and to even suggest that 2 young girls do is absolutely ridiculous especially when nationalist youths are rioting, shouting sectarian abuse and you palm it off as they are only thugs and rep[resent no-one. If they were only thugs then why all the sectarian abuse?
Jim whetehr or not these thugs want a scrap, deal in drugs etc etc they still to an extent are politically motivated, the fact they shout sectarian abuse, write sectarian abuse on walls etc and attack those of different political and religious backgrounds are proof of this.
WTF??? Man where were you during the troubles when rioters took to the streets under the leadership of sf/ira?
|
|
