|
|
Post by Harry on Oct 23, 2009 15:06:47 GMT
I don't know exactly what the rules etc are on the early release of prisoners etc but the law should be applied to this man and his license revoked if thats what the rules are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wasp on Oct 24, 2009 21:47:18 GMT
Well it wasnt him who started this, but he reacted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wasp on Oct 27, 2009 22:13:27 GMT
Well it wasnt him who started this, but he reacted. He reacted WASP? He battered two women. Cop yourself on. First of all I have no love for Knight, secondly he was attacked by one of the women and reacted and I do not justify any attack on women. Bit rich you complaining about Knight attacking any woman considering your beloved ira kidnapped, tortured and killed women as well as tuing them to lamposts and tar and feathering them. What is sickening me more is the weakness of Unionist politicians to stand upto the claims made by dallat and even the priest in Greysteel. They were both on tv talking about how unfair it was for the victims families to meet knight on the street 16 years on blah fucking blah. I understand this and agree with these feelings but what about the many many people butchered by republicans now out walking the street and where the families of their victims have the high possibility of meeting them. Knight was not the only person released under the terms of the gfa. |
|
|
|
Post by Wasp on Oct 27, 2009 22:17:19 GMT
On an added note if you knew the full story surrounding this you would be in for a bit of a surprize but that is not for me to say on any forum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blue Angel on Oct 28, 2009 15:14:14 GMT
My own personal feeling at this point is ANYONE who was released early under the GFA from ANY group who behaves like this should be going straight back to a diet of porridge, on that I agree with Harry.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wasp on Oct 28, 2009 15:40:57 GMT
No its not chalk and cheese setanta and I am not going to let you off that easily and brush the past under the carpet letting us all ignore and forget what the ira done to teenage girls and women in general. What the ira done to women is nothing compared to anyman who uses domestic violence or any type of violence to any woman, partner or other. People like your party colleagues fully endorsed such brutal attacks and I am sure sf members who were also in the ira would have been involved like other ira members in dushing out such cowardly attacks against women.
What is it that I do the same on here all the time??? Come on please tell me.
To do with the other things you asked me to say, you will see since you have been following the story that there has been a long family feud and the reasons behind this, what has happened etc etc is very much part and parcel of this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wasp on Oct 28, 2009 20:55:06 GMT
Are you on drugs or something because you are talking about some fantasy romantic novel or something, we are talking about the ira. No force was occupying N.Ireland during the troubles, the vast majority of people wanted troops here and welcomed them, the vast majority of RUC/UDR officers were born and bred here on British soil. So dont insult all those brutaly killed and maimed by nonsense excuses and totally flawed excuses. The ira were women battering and murdering scum bags and their supporters are no better than those who carried out these vile attacks. Hypocritical bastards.
Violence is acceptable in situations, of course it is, but is violence against unarmed defencless women accpetable?? No point me asking you that because it is obvious to you and many republicans it certainly is, your weak and feeble lying excuses speaks volumes about your politics and what kind of man you are.
Of course I do and if you read my post you will see I said those sentiments expressed were understandable, those opinions were not the problem or issue I had.
Unlike yourself I would never excuse what he done or excuse anyone who attacks defenceless women, vulnerable women or teenage girls because of who their boyfriends are. What I said was there was alot more to this story and I believe he was attacked first but that does not excuse his reaction. Not like you to take a judge's word for anything especially when people like you moaned for years about alledged wrongfull convictions with all those innocent terrorists jailed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blue Angel on Oct 28, 2009 21:55:01 GMT
I've got to say justifying tarring and feathering women and shaving their heads as did occur in the north is not something I feel comfortable with. Unlike WASP I do see the North as an occupied territory but I think trying to make even an indirect comparision with the craziness that went on in occupied France is not useful and I would have found problems with the way even the women who collabrated with the Nazis were treated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wasp on Oct 28, 2009 23:04:49 GMT
BA read the thread I started on the general board and tell me how much of that you feel comfortable with??
|
|
