Post by earl on May 30, 2008 16:43:37 GMT
Amnesty accuses Ireland of putting profit before people
AMNESTY International has accused Ireland of protecting American investment in the country ahead of the need to protect human rights.
The human rights organisation's most senior global official yesterday highlighted the alleged use of Shannon airport for the secret and illegal transfer of prisoners to US camps.
Amnesty's Secretary-General Irene Khan said in London that US assurances it did not transport prisoners through Shannon "were really not worth the paper they were written on". And Irish executive director Colm O'Gorman told the Irish Independent there was a perception Ireland had "placed economic success above the rendition and illegal transportation of boys and men for the purposes of torture".
The hard-hitting comments , however, are unlikely to change the Government's policy of refusing to put pressure on the US over the flights.
A spokeswoman for the Department of Foreign Affairs said: "The Government is unequivocally opposed to extraordinary rendition and have made this clear to the US on many occasions. The assurances given to Ireland, and confirmed at the highest level, are of a particular clarity and comprehensiveness in the wider European context.
"It remains the case that there is no evidence, nor even a single concrete or credible allegation, that any extraordinary rendition has ever taken place through Ireland."
But Mr O'Gorman added: "The Government must now come out and explain its stance of just accepting assurances from the US.
"What's behind the thinking on this, is it, as some believe is the real subtext, that we we are putting US investments in Ireland above our obligations in regard to human rights?"
AMNESTY International has accused Ireland of protecting American investment in the country ahead of the need to protect human rights.
The human rights organisation's most senior global official yesterday highlighted the alleged use of Shannon airport for the secret and illegal transfer of prisoners to US camps.
Amnesty's Secretary-General Irene Khan said in London that US assurances it did not transport prisoners through Shannon "were really not worth the paper they were written on". And Irish executive director Colm O'Gorman told the Irish Independent there was a perception Ireland had "placed economic success above the rendition and illegal transportation of boys and men for the purposes of torture".
The hard-hitting comments , however, are unlikely to change the Government's policy of refusing to put pressure on the US over the flights.
A spokeswoman for the Department of Foreign Affairs said: "The Government is unequivocally opposed to extraordinary rendition and have made this clear to the US on many occasions. The assurances given to Ireland, and confirmed at the highest level, are of a particular clarity and comprehensiveness in the wider European context.
"It remains the case that there is no evidence, nor even a single concrete or credible allegation, that any extraordinary rendition has ever taken place through Ireland."
But Mr O'Gorman added: "The Government must now come out and explain its stance of just accepting assurances from the US.
"What's behind the thinking on this, is it, as some believe is the real subtext, that we we are putting US investments in Ireland above our obligations in regard to human rights?"